Showing 51 to 55 of 98 blog articles.
INDIVIDUAL INVOLVEMENT EPISODE 2.


In the second episode of this campaign am saying that Africans can only truly understand this, if they are exposed to content underlining the importance of biodiversity and conservation frequently.


It is no secret that television programmes, newspaper articles and social media determine what we talk about in our homes, workplaces and local eateries. We are what we watch and read.

This is why it is high time  both mojo live streaming and the media, traditional and social-steps up to their role of setting the agenda and turns its focus to what really matters, the environment. The people who have the ability to reach millions of Africans on a daily basis and shape the narratives in the African households also wield the power to ensure that wildlife thrives in modern Africa.

I know that this content exists, but we need to see more of it. If Africans begin to see more content on nature and wildlife, the conversation will definitely begin to change. Especially if other Africans, who are equally invested in the wellbeing and the development of the continent, tell them conservation is important.

Today, young Africans, who stand to lose the most as a result of nature’s destruction, dominate the media both social and traditional on the continent. We are members of the most educated generation Africa has ever had. We travelled more than our  parents ever did and the internet has opened the world to us in ways that previous generations could not even dream of. We  are innovative, technologically savvy, and even braver than the generations that liberated us from colonialism. 

To be continued next week…..

  4 years ago
Major Routes for Illegal Wildlife Trade



Major Routes for Illegal Wildlife Trade

The illegal wildlife trade is a complex and pervasive issue that spans across continents, often exploiting vulnerable ecosystems and endangered species. Major routes for this illicit trade are established based on demand, availability of species, and the effectiveness of law enforcement in various regions. Key areas of focus include Africa and Asia, where rich biodiversity often coexists with political and economic instability. The routes typically emerge from regions abundant in specific wildlife, such as elephants and rhinos in Africa or tigers and pangolins in Asia, moving through various countries before reaching ultimate consumers in wealthier nations.

One of the most notorious routes for illegal wildlife trafficking starts in Central and East Africa, where poachers target iconic species like elephants for their ivory and rhinos for their horns. From countries like Tanzania, Kenya, and the Democratic Republic of Congo, traffickers often transport contraband through ports such as Mombasa, using shipping containers to disguise their illicit cargo. These routes are further complicated by corruption and inadequate enforcement, allowing traffickers to operate with relative impunity. The ivory trade, in particular, has seen a significant increase in demand from Asian markets, making Africa a focal point for poaching and trafficking activities.

In Asia, the illegal wildlife trade is heavily driven by traditional medicine markets and exotic pet industries. Countries like Vietnam and China serve as major destinations for wildlife products, including tiger bones and bear bile. The trade often utilizes overland routes through countries like Laos and Cambodia, where borders are less monitored, facilitating the movement of trafficked goods. Wildlife traffickers frequently exploit the porous nature of these borders to evade detection, taking advantage of local economies and sometimes involving local communities in the trade, whether willingly or through coercion.

The consequences of these trafficking routes extend beyond the immediate loss of biodiversity. The illegal wildlife trade threatens entire ecosystems, disrupts local communities, and undermines conservation efforts. As species populations dwindle, the ecological balance is disturbed, leading to unforeseen consequences such as habitat degradation and the collapse of local fauna and flora. Furthermore, the financial gains from wildlife crime often fund other criminal activities, including drug trafficking and arms smuggling, creating a broader network of organized crime that poses significant challenges to law enforcement agencies worldwide.

Efforts to combat these major routes for illegal wildlife trade have seen varying degrees of success. International cooperation, such as the implementation of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), has been instrumental in regulating trade and enhancing enforcement. Successful prosecutions in high-profile cases send a strong message, but consistent follow-through is crucial. Community involvement is also vital, as local populations often hold the key to sustainable conservation practices. By educating and empowering these communities, the push against wildlife crime can become a collective effort, fostering a greater appreciation for biodiversity and a commitment to protecting it for future generations.

Identification of Hotspot Regions

The identification of hotspot regions for wildlife crime is crucial in developing effective strategies to combat poaching and the illegal wildlife trade. These hotspots are often characterized by a combination of high biodiversity and significant threats, including economic instability, weak governance, and inadequate law enforcement. Regions such as Southeast Asia, Central Africa, and parts of Latin America have been identified as critical areas where wildlife crime flourishes. In these areas, the intersection of poverty, corruption, and demand for wildlife products creates an environment where illegal activities are prevalent.

In Southeast Asia, countries like Vietnam and Thailand have emerged as major transit points for illegal wildlife trafficking. The demand for tiger parts, pangolin scales, and exotic birds drives poachers to exploit these regions. Furthermore, the porous borders and limited enforcement capabilities allow traffickers to operate with relative impunity. Identifying these hotspots requires collaboration between local governments, conservation organizations, and international bodies to gather data on wildlife population trends, poaching incidents, and trafficking routes.

Central Africa faces unique challenges, as it is home to some of the world's most endangered species, including elephants and rhinos. The illegal ivory trade has decimated elephant populations in countries like Gabon and the Republic of Congo. Conflict and instability in the region further complicate conservation efforts, making it essential to pinpoint areas where poaching is most rampant. By employing satellite imagery, wildlife monitoring technologies, and community reporting systems, conservationists can track poaching activities and develop targeted interventions.

In Latin America, the illegal trade of wildlife, particularly in the Amazon rainforest, poses a significant threat to biodiversity. Species such as macaws, tortoises, and various reptiles are heavily trafficked, often leading to population declines and ecosystem disruption. Identifying these hotspot regions involves understanding the socio-economic factors at play, including deforestation, agricultural expansion, and the role of organized crime in wildlife trafficking. Collaborating with local communities to raise awareness and promote sustainable practices can help mitigate these threats.

Effective identification of wildlife crime hotspots not only aids in resource allocation for enforcement but also informs global conservation strategies. By understanding the specific dynamics of each region, stakeholders can create tailored approaches that address the root causes of wildlife crime. This may involve strengthening local laws, improving community involvement in conservation efforts, and enhancing international cooperation to dismantle trafficking networks. Ultimately, a comprehensive understanding of hotspot regions is essential in the ongoing fight against wildlife crime, ensuring the protection of endangered species and the preservation of biodiversity for future generations.

Be sure to visit Mojostreaming.com and https://mojostreamingwildlife.com/

MojoStreaming Ltd

Cami Ciotta

producer@wildlifecrimeseries.com

Project in development: "Wild Justice" TV Series on Wildlife Crime

  2 years ago
GORILLA BERINGEI BERINGEI.

Sending you lovely greetings from the land of mountain

Gorillas and the Pearl of Africa. Following our interaction last week, I come

here again with some facts about mountain Gorillas, which I have learnt throughout.

Truly I first encountered them, when I was 5 years old,

since then my experience and love for them has been interesting

. Gorillas are ground-dwelling, predominantly herbivorous

great apes that inhabit the tropical forests of central Sub-Saharan Africa. The

Gorilla genus is divided into two species the eastern gorillas and the western

gorillas, and either four or five subspecies. They are the largest remaining

primates (Apes) on earth.

As our main focus is on Mountain gorillas, mountain gorillas

only live in the dense vegetation of Uganda's Bwindi Impenetrable Forest

National Park and along the dormant volcanic Virunga Mountain range that

stretches across Rwanda's Volcanoes National Park, Uganda's Mgahinga Gorilla

National Park, and Virunga National Park in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Amongst

the questions was, what’s

threatening the live of a gorilla and will they be extinct?

One of the main reason’s gorillas are going extinct is

habitat loss, forests where gorillas have lived for many years are being

destroyed for agricultural use, commercial logging and many other activities,

this leaves gorillas in hard conditions as they can hardly live elsewhere

except in their Natural habitats

One

other burning and lovely question was, how strong are mountain Gorillas?

 

Now, I want to make one thing clear. No one really knows how

strong a gorilla is. They haven’t competed in strong man (ape) competitions.

And no one has fought a gorilla against a buffalo, hippo or even a bear

(thankfully). This post is a combination of facts and conjecture.

Another

interesting question was, do gorillas talk?

Just like in humans, gorilla communication can occur through

a variety of methods body postures, facial expressions, vocalizations. Mountain

Gorillas use a variety of behaviors and vocalizations to communicate dominance

Another

one was, what do

Gorillas eat?  

Mountain Gorillas stick to a mainly vegetarian diet, feeding

on stems, bamboo shoots and fruits. Western lowland gorillas, however, also

have an appetite for termites and ants, and break open termite nests to eat the

larvae.

And the

main deal of this article was, where do mountain gorillas sleep?

Mountain Gorillas build nests in which to sleep, both on the

ground and in trees, made of leaves and branches. Counting abandoned nests is

an effective way for scientists to estimate population size. As you will see

the photos bellow.

And of

course, like many conservationists. Another question was who scares the gentle

giants?

mountain gorillas like other primates and humans are scared

of water and some insects like caterpillars and reptiles like Chameleon.

Gorillas like other apes including humans find it hard to swim naturally which

prompts them to desist from expanse water masses (big water bodies) like Lakes

and Rivers.  And part from humans,

gorillas don't really have enemies. The only predator to prey on gorillas is

the leopard. Walter Baumgärtel found the remains of several gorillas after they

had been killed by leopards in the Virunga Volcanoes.

Amongst

other questions was, how can one help to save these gentle Giants?

One of the most effective ways to help mountain gorillas

survive, is to donate money to organizations working on the ground to conserve

the species. Numerous organizations including Over and Above Bwindi (OAB) under

Interior safaris East Africa have

spent decades finding effective methods for protecting mountain gorillas, and

most rely on grants and donations to fund our work through these activities, you

would have surely saved a gorilla.

Trekking or tracking the gorillas.

Creating awareness.

Avoid trekking gorillas when you're ill.

Making direct Donations.

Support the local communities.

Follow rules and regulations.

Engage in other activities.

For more information please contact us through the link below .

http://interiorsafarisea.com/contact/

 

  5 years ago
The Shooting Trap Part 3. Words Can Hurt


Words can hurt - in this case kill, by definition…
Supposed to be the last argument, but maybe not
Words have meaning, lead to shared understanding 
Trophy on its own a clear word, same for Hunting 
Compounded they go oxymoronic, nonsensical 
Marketing for deliberately misleading
Trophy Hunting, no sporting prowess killing
Feel good appellation - maybe only feel better
Body parts are not trophies in 2022, neither manhood rituals
Like they were in early human wars and hunting gathering 
Held some mystical power over a dead enemy
Since when an enemy - a lion, elephant, giraffe, a rhino
And all of the others savagely pictured and posted
When it’s minding its own business
Just trying to stay alive in its own habitat
When was Trophy appropriated to blood-sport
For that matter, when did sport turn to killing
Its just a transaction, akin to an execution
A Trophy Hunter Hit Man fulfilling his own Contract
Purchases a licence to kill
Still misnomenclatured, still oxymoronic
Ethics left to humans playing god
When nature is ruled by the gods of chance
No guarantee for prey to make it through the day
Even if they could pray
Let the Dictionaries take note, erroneous definition
Trophy Hunting is neither sport not hunting
The search is on for its definitive replacement 
Body Part Killing, no direct transliteration 
Killing Animals for Body Parts - sounds like the descriptor
There’s a challenge for you 
Come up with an accurate name
Animal Killing (for no good reason (understood)
Is as close as a poet can get
Until creative licence is enacted
Thrill Killing grinning, compulsive killing chilling
Any deprecating descriptor
Still more accurate than Trophy Hunting
Put it in a can, as they do with lions
Let them shoot it down, a guaranteed kill
Let them pose, maniacally grinning
Next to the lifeless, grotesque corpse
Trophy Hunting, rest in pieces
Valued parts cut off, carted away
To stare out in death another day
From a former killer’s wall

‘It’s easier from an armchair’
I agree with Roger, in ‘Drowse’
Making these ‘expert’ comments
In ignorance from far away

No one wins this debate
While the animals lose their lives
To ‘conserve’ more of their kind 
Into it they fell so easily
The Shooting Trap

  4 years ago
Challenges to Shell’s seismic blasting on South Africa’s Wild Coast

From the Centre for Environmental Rights, South Africa: Challenges to Shell’s seismic blasting on South Africa’s Wild Coast

6 DECEMBER 2021

Background

In early 2013 Impact Africa applied for an Exploration Right for petroleum resources in terms of section 79 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act, 2002 (MPRDA). The Application was accompanied by an Environmental Management Programme (EMPr) which was submitted for approval in terms of (the then) section 39 of the MPRDA. After submission of the EMPr, the Petroleum Agency of South Africa (PASA) accepted the application on 1 March 2013, and required a Public Participation Process to be conducted.

PASA and the Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy issued Impact Africa with the Exploration Right on 20 May 2014. This right was renewed in 2017 and for the second time in 2020, effective for a period of two years from August 2021.

Royal Dutch Shell PLC and its subsidiaries, as Operator of the Exploration Right, intend to commence with 3D seismic surveys for the exploration of petroleum resources in certain licence blocks off the Wild Coast region of South Africa.

According to the EMPr, the seismic survey involves extremely loud (220 decibels) underwater explosions or discharges at intervals of 10 to 20 seconds which are to continue 24 hours per day for four to five months. The EMPr provides that a vessel will tow an airgun array with up to 12 or more lines of hydrophones spaced 5 to 10 meters apart and between 3 and 25 meters below the water surface. The array can be upwards of 12,000 meters long and 1,200 meters wide.

Many prominent South African marine scientists have called on the government to halt the survey due to concerns about harmful impacts on South Africa’s marine ecosystems and coastal communities.

Two urgent applications were brought challenging the seismic surveys on behalf of interested and affected parties including local associations, environmental justice organisations and residents of the Wild Coast region.

Note that the Centre for Environmental Rights does not represent any of the parties in these matters.

Urgent interdict application brought by Border Deep Sea Angling Association, Kei Mouth Ski Boat Club, Natural Justice and GreenPeace Environmental Organisation in the High Court of South Africa (Eastern Cape Division, Grahamstown) and represented by Cullinan & Associates Inc and Ricky Stone:

Letters:

Pleadings:

Confirmatory Affidavits:

Heads of Argument

Judgment

  • Judgment of the High Court of South Africa (Eastern Cape Division, Grahamstown) (3 December 2021)
  • Outcome: Acting Judge Govindjee, for the court, dismissed the application, with costs. The court held that the applicants had failed to establish one of the requirements for an interdict – a well grounded apprehension of irreparable harm. The court found that the evidence used by the Applicants to establish this ground was speculative and that the mitigation measures proposed by Shell mean that the seismic survey activities must remain ‘low-risk.’

Urgent interdict application brought by Sustaining the Wild Coast NPC, Mashona Dlamini, Dwesa-Cwebe Communal Property Association and four Others in the High Court of South Africa (Eastern Cape Division, Grahamstown) represented by the Legal Resources Centre and Richard Spoor Inc.

Pleadings:

  4 years ago