The Ugandan kob (Kobus kob thomasi), male,Queen Elizabeth NP, Uganda, 2016.
The Ugandan kob is a subspecies of the kob, a type of antelope. Only the males have horns, which are lyre-shaped, strongly ridged and divergent.
Males are slightly larger than females, being 90 to 100 cm (3.0 to 3.3 ft) at the shoulder, with an average weight of 94 kg (207 lb), while females are 82 to 92 cm (2.7 to 3.0 ft) at the shoulder and on average weigh about 63 kg (139 lb). Apart from the throat patch, muzzle, eye-ring and inner ear, which are white, the coat is golden to reddish-brown, the color differentiating it from other kob subspecies. The belly and inside of the legs are white, and the front of the forelegs are black.
It is typically found in open or wooded savanna, within a reasonable distance of water, and it also occurs in grasslands near rivers and lakes.
Ugandan kobs are herbivores and feed largely on grasses and reeds.
The females and young males form loose groups of varying size which range according to food availability, often moving along watercourses and grazing in valley bottoms. Sometimes non-breeding males form their own groups. Ugandan kobs usually have a lek mating system, in which males defend small territories clustered on traditional mating grounds. Females visit these leks only to breed, and males provide no parental care. Each lek is associated with a female herd of about 100 individuals. Females begin to mate at the age of one, but males must normally wait for several more years. A single calf is born in November or December, after a gestation period of about nine months.
Ugandan kob appears on the coat of arms of Uganda. #Godfreytheguide #Uganda #Animals #Antelope.
www.interiorsafarisea.com
The case against trophy hunting
1)Trophy hunting defies all logic.
It’s a bizarre notion to shoot something you are trying to protect in the first place. Let’s take the example of wolves, which faced extinction not so long ago. Spending decades bringing them back from extinction makes no sense, only to begin killing them again.
2)Trophy hunting is unethical.
Most importantly, the practice is entirely unethical. It causes suffering to the hunted animal. Indeed this suffering exceeds much more in magnitude than the pleasure it gives the hunter! Mankind is supposed to be the protector and guardian of the planet and its inhabitants. Instead, post-industrial age, humans have treated our animals and our forests like expendable resources and garbage exclusively for their own selfish use and with complete disregard for everything else. The caveman of thousands of years ago had far more respect for our animals and forests and only killed to survive. Animal populations are collapsing and, inevitably, so will our civilization.
3)Trophy hunting does more harm to the very species it is supposed to protect
Trophy hunters make unsubstantiated claims that a small amount of controlled trophy hunting does not harm populations. However, this is not true. Trophy hunting can backfire and hurt the overall population of a species. Let’s take the example of lions. For trophy hunters, shooting the biggest and strongest adult male lion is the most desirable type of hunt by wealthy foreign hunters. However, it is a well-known fact that an adult male is the protector of his pride, protecting the females and other male offspring. If it gets killed, other male lions will attack and kill weaker lions in the pride to take over the leaderless pride, thus further reducing the numbers to the further detriment of the species. There are countless real-life examples of this phenomenon.
4)Does money from Trophy hunting help conservation?
There is no real proof that money raised by trophy hunting helps a species or local communities. I believe it is a misconception that revenues from trophy hunting help with conservation. This is what so-called” conservationists” would conveniently like the world to believe. On a broad scale, corrupt government officials, middlemen travel companies, and sports outfitters organizing the trophy hunt end up with the lion's share of the proceeds, and perhaps only a trickle goes to conservation and rural communities. I think the notion that trophy hunting helps conservation is like putting lipstick on a pig in a false attempt to hide its ugliness. The notion that Trophy hunting helps to protect the species is simply a guise to justify this gruesome practice. In all reality, it is simply providing a thrill to wealthy people who get a kick out of killing an endangered animal. True conservation activities should sustainably involve local communities, not benefit organizers, middlemen, and corrupt officials.
5)Trophy hunting undermines efforts to curb poaching.
What kind of mixed message are we sending poachers? It’s a double standard to come down hard on poachers who are simply trying to feed their families but greenlight wealthy thrill-seeking foreigners to hunt and kill animals. Poaching and trophy hunting is disgusting practices from a wildlife standpoint, especially for endangered species, which seem to attract an unusually large number of trophy hunters to hunt and kill these animals.
6)Trophy hunting is a lucrative big business making the case for even more trophy hunting
Because trophy hunting has become a big business, getting carried away and increasing quotas for the number of animals to hunt is easy. Corrupt politicians and organizers will find a way to make trophy hunting more lucrative for themselves at the detriment of the species.
7)Trophy hunting impairs genetic selection
As noted earlier, the most prized trophy hunts by wealthy foreigners granting them the most significant bragging and boasting rights are to take down the strongest males by targeting, for example, the ones with the most prominent horns of the most prominent tusks. This leaves only the less fit males in the population. Effectively, trophy hunting is weakening the DNA of a species over time.
Interestingly, even the original first nations inhabitants respected the leader of a pack, the strongest of the bunch. They would hunt the weaker animals for survival. Our modern civilization does not understand the importance of this simple but essential concept of genetic selection for the ongoing survival of a species.
8)Trophy hunting supports other harmful industries
Trophy hunting supports other industries that are detrimental to society by enabling weapons companies to make even more guns and fossil fuel companies provide dirty fuel for the long flights to take foreign trophy hunters to far away remote places to commit their heinous crimes against a harmless species already facing extinction.
These are just some of the reasons why trophy hunting should be banned entirely. So many humane ways can help protect a species facing extinction. Simple eco-tourism comes to
mind, where wealthy folks can take their families on safaris to see these animals in the natural setting. Shoot animals with your cameras, not rifles!
The extinction of a species is a global problem, not a local one. Imagine if every government across the globe donated a tiny tine minute fractional percentage of their tax revenues towards ending the extinction of species globally. This would make many resources available for conservation efforts to preserve a species. Far more than resorting to killing more of the same species!
I challenge anyone to argue otherwise and, more importantly, provide concrete evidence and data, to disprove my rationale for ending this cruel and inhumane practice of trophy hunting!
Munir Noorbhai
(Private citizen who wants to do right by animals before it is too late!)
Visit the discussion on Trophy Hunting: https://www.mojostreaming.com/video/685/trophy-hunting-debate-episode-1
As a wildlife filmmaker based in a country like India that is high on blue chip and large scale productions and popular voices doing voice overs, specializing in conservation filmmaking is harder than one can imagine.
India is home to Bollywood, an industry that producers over 300-350 Hindi language films each year, my conservation film on roadkills stands almost no chance of getting noticed.
This makes it a challenge to hit that mark with your target audience and get the publicity ball rolling.
How do I address this gap? Well, we make them feel emotionally attached to the animal.
You make it relatable.
You could look at the Big 5 or similar megafauna or make the story feel relatable and humanized. Personified.
Add the drama. Add conflict.
Add the sense of adventure and the idea of pursuing something.
Make them feel like their involvement in this story is worth their time :)
Wildlife crime encompasses a range of illegal activities that threaten the survival of animal and plant species worldwide. At its core, it includes poaching, the illegal hunting or capturing of wildlife, and the illicit trade of their products. This crime not only targets endangered species but also affects ecosystems and biodiversity as a whole. Understanding the definition and scope of wildlife crime is crucial for nature lovers and activists who seek to protect the delicate balance of our natural world. The severity of wildlife crime is underscored by its connection to organized crime syndicates, which operate across borders, making it a global concern that transcends local and national jurisdictions.
Poaching poses one of the most significant threats to wildlife, particularly for endangered species like elephants, rhinos, and tigers. These animals are often hunted for their ivory, horns, or skins, which are sold for high prices in illegal markets. The demand for these products fuels a cycle of violence and destruction, as poachers often use sophisticated techniques and equipment to carry out their activities. The impact of poaching extends beyond the immediate loss of individual animals; it can destabilize entire ecosystems and disrupt food chains, leading to broader ecological repercussions. For wildlife enthusiasts, recognizing the signs of poaching and its consequences is essential for advocacy and conservation efforts.
Illegal wildlife trade networks operate on a global scale, facilitating the movement of poached animals and their parts. These networks exploit weaknesses in legal frameworks and enforcement mechanisms, often involving corrupt officials and dangerous criminal organizations. The trade in wildlife is not limited to charismatic megafauna; it also includes a wide range of species, from reptiles and birds to plants. The complexity of these networks makes it challenging for law enforcement agencies to combat wildlife crime effectively. Awareness of the intricacies of these trade routes is vital for activists who wish to dismantle such operations and promote sustainable practices.
The impact of wildlife crime on biodiversity cannot be overstated. As species are driven to extinction, the natural balance of ecosystems is disrupted, affecting not only wildlife but also human communities that rely on these ecosystems for their livelihoods. The loss of biodiversity can lead to diminished natural resources, increased human-wildlife conflicts, and reduced resilience to environmental changes. For nature lovers, the health of ecosystems is intertwined with their passion for wildlife, making it imperative to address the underlying causes of wildlife crime and advocate for stronger protections for both animals and their habitats.
Legislation and enforcement play critical roles in the fight against wildlife crime. Many countries have implemented laws aimed at protecting endangered species and regulating wildlife trade. However, the effectiveness of these laws often hinges on enforcement capabilities and international cooperation. Successful prosecutions of wildlife crime serve as powerful case studies that highlight the importance of accountability in deterring illegal activities. Engaging local communities in conservation efforts is another key strategy to combat wildlife crime, as these communities can be both victims and protectors of wildlife. By fostering a sense of stewardship and providing economic alternatives, it is possible to build a more sustainable future for both wildlife and people.
Understanding the historical context of wildlife crime is essential to grasp the significant challenges faced in the global fight against this pressing issue. For centuries, humans have exploited wildlife for various purposes, ranging from sustenance to ornamentation. The rise of the industrial age marked a pivotal moment, as demand surged for animal products like ivory, fur, and exotic pets. This exploitation was often fueled by colonial expansion, where resources were extracted with little regard for ecological consequences. As a result, many species faced severe population declines, prompting early conservation efforts in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, which laid the groundwork for modern wildlife protection laws.
As the 20th century progressed, wildlife crime evolved alongside changes in technology and commerce. The advent of global trade agreements and advancements in transportation made it easier for illegal wildlife products to cross borders. Organized crime syndicates began to recognize the lucrative potential of wildlife trafficking, leading to a dramatic increase in poaching, particularly of endangered species. Iconic animals like elephants and rhinoceroses became prime targets due to the high value of their tusks and horns. The illegal wildlife trade transformed from opportunistic poaching into a sophisticated, multi-billion-dollar industry, with complex networks operating across continents.
The impact of wildlife crime on biodiversity cannot be overstated. As species are driven to extinction due to poaching and habitat destruction, the ecological balance is disrupted, affecting entire ecosystems. This loss of biodiversity has far-reaching implications, from diminishing resilience against climate change to disrupting food webs. The decline of keystone species can trigger cascading effects, leading to the deterioration of habitats and the extinction of other flora and fauna. Recognizing these consequences has led to increased advocacy for stronger wildlife protection measures and greater awareness of the interconnectedness of species and ecosystems.
In response to the growing crisis, legislative frameworks have emerged to combat wildlife crime. International agreements such as the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) aim to regulate and monitor the trade of endangered species. Countries have also enacted national laws to strengthen enforcement against poaching and trafficking. Successful prosecutions of high-profile wildlife crime cases serve as pivotal moments that not only bring justice but also raise public awareness. These cases illustrate the importance of collaboration among governments, NGOs, and local communities in the fight against wildlife crime.
Community involvement has emerged as a critical component in the fight against wildlife crime. Local populations are often on the front lines, witnessing the effects of poaching and habitat loss firsthand. Empowering communities through education, alternative livelihoods, and participatory conservation initiatives has proven effective in reducing reliance on illegal wildlife trade. By fostering a sense of stewardship for local wildlife, communities can play a vital role in protecting their natural heritage. Additionally, understanding wildlife trafficking routes and hotspots is essential for targeted enforcement efforts, as these areas often indicate higher levels of illegal activity. Engaging local stakeholders in these efforts not only aids in conservation but also promotes sustainable development, aligning the interests of both wildlife and people.
Cami Ciotta
MojoStreaming
Creator of an upcoming TV Series on Wildlife Crime - If you would like to learn more contact Cami at producer@wildlifecrimeseries.com
The Botstiber Institute for Wildlife Fertility Control's (BIWFC) 2022 Summer Newsletter is now available. In this edition you will learn about the recent 9th International Conference on Wildlife Fertility Control hosted by BIWFC in Colorado Springs, as well as other wildlife fertility control projects and issues.
The Botstiber Institute for Wildlife Fertility Control is a non-profit organization that aims to advance the use of effective, sustainable fertility control methods to mitigate human - wildlife conflicts and promote coexistence worldwide. BIWFC, established in 2016 as a partnership between the Dietrich W. Botstiber Foundation and The Humane Society of the United States, is headquartered in Media, PA with an additional office at the University of York in the United Kingdom. To learn more visit wildlifefertilitycontrol.org
